Wednesday, 23 October 2013

Capital Punishment

 The triviality of offences carrying the death sentence was remarkable; as late as 1450, by the old Admiralty law relative to the Humber, there was an order that ‘any man who stole ropes, nets, cords etc., amounting to the value of ninepence, should at low watermark have his hands and feet bound, his throat cut, his tongue pulled out, and his body thrown into the sea’.
Any man, who removed the anchor from any ship, or cut the cable of a ship while she was riding at anchor, was liable to be hanged at low water mark.


Prisoners who refused to plead guilty were starved to death, or starved until they changed their minds. In 1426 this type of penalty could be that the prisoner was placed on his back in a low, dark room, with only a cloth round his loins, then as many weights as he could bear without crushing his ribs would be put on him. The first day he would be given a portion of mouldy bread, the next day a few drops of foul water and so on; ‘so shall he continue till he die’.

In the reign of Henry V111 it was made legal (the Act passed in 1531) to punish by boiling to death.
Richard Roose, or Coke, a cook, was accused of trying to poison, with a brew of hemlock and other fatal herbs, the Bishop of Rochester’s household, and the poor of the local parish. Two people died and several were seriously ill.
The cook was publicly boiled to death at Smithfield in a huge cauldron suspended from a strong iron tripod over a pile of logs. He suffered agony for two hours before he finally died.

In King’s Lynne, in the same year, a servant of Margaret Davy was found guilty of poisoning her mistress so was boiled to death in the marketplace, and similarly another servant received the same death penalty in Smithfield, in 1542.

In 1547 the law was repealed by Edward V1 and the Act was substituted by hanging, except in the case of women who poisoned their husband or child, when the penalty was burning.

In Brittany, in 1580, coining was punished by first boiling and then hanging the offender.


Ducking and drowning, in addition to burning were punishments inflicted for witchcraft in England and Scotland. In 1623 eleven Gypsy women were condemned to be drowned at Edinburgh, and on May 11th, 1685, Margaret M’Lachlan, aged sixty three, and Margaret Wilson, aged eighteen, were drowned in the Blednoch, for denying that James V11 of Scotland was entitled to rule the church according to his wishes.
The last undisputed case of legal drowning happened when a woman was convicted of theft and sentenced to be drowned in the Loch of Spyne, Scotland. It is believed that when the lake was drained in the nineteenth century, an identifiable ring was found on her remains lying on the bed of the lake.

Drowning continued in France until 1793.

In the reign of Elizabeth, when rebellious priests were hanged, drawn and quartered, the queen occasionally gave orders that the victim should be quite conscious when disembowelling began. The punishment was finally settled by the Statute of Treason of 25 Edward 111, 1351.
The sentence was, ‘that the traitor is to be taken from prison and laid on a hurdle (in earlier days he was dragged along the ground, tied to the tail of a horse), and drawn to the gallows, then hanged by the neck until he was nearly dead, then cut down; then his entrails were to be cut out of his body and burnt by the executioner; then his head to be cut off , his body divided into four quarters, and afterwards set up in some open place as directed.’
This brutality was justified by Lord Coke through a collection of Bible texts, and hence called ‘godly butchery’.

Mr Justice Blackstone (Commen. Vol.1V,), ‘ there are but few instances, and those accidental or by negligence, of persons being disembowelled till previously deprived of sensation by strangling’.
There are, however, several instances on record in which the sentence has been executed ‘in all its literal rigour’. The conspirators in Babington’s plot in1586 were all disembowelled alive; some of them looking on while the details of the execution took place upon their companions (Howell, State Trials ).

The punishment for high treason differed from that inflicted for murder in several important details. The criminal had to be drawn to the gallows, not allowed to walk; he was to be cut down alive; his entrails taken out and burnt in front of his face; he was then ‘headed’ – head cut off – and the body quartered. The quarters were parboiled to preserve them and the various parts were distributed in different places and hung for public viewing.

In History, by Meiklejohn, he states that after the Monmouth Rebellion,the pitch cauldron was constantly boiling in the assize towns and the heads and limbs preserved in it were distributed over the lovely western country, where, for years after, in spite of storms and crows and foxes, they frightened the village labourer as he passed to his cottage in the evening gloom’.
‘The peasant who had consented to perform this hideous office returned to his plough. But a mark like that of Cain was upon him. He was known throughout the village by the horrible name of William Boilman’.

Among the notable early victims of the sentence were:

1326 – the elder and the younger Despencers

1395 – Wallace

1403 – Hotspur

The Chancellor’s Roll states that the cost of Wallace’s execution and transmitting the quarters to Scotland was 61s. 10d.

A similar punishment, although partially special to parricide, was carried out in England, as one of others adopted as a warning.

Philip Standsfield in 1688, found guilty of treason for insulting his father and being implicated in his murder, was sentenced to be hanged at the Mercat Cross till he was dead, his tongue to be cut out and burnt upon a scaffold, his right hand to be cut off and attached on the East Port of Haddington, and his body to be carried, not drawn, to the ‘Gallowee between Leith and Edinburgh, and there to be hanged in chains, and his name, fame, memory and honours to be extinct, and his arms be riven forth and delete out of the book of arms’.

Among offences involving the sentence of death were:

Act of 1698 – stealing privately from a shop goods to the value of five shillings

Act of 1713 – stealing in a dwelling house to the amount of 40 shillings

The Black Act 1723 – cutting down a tree

Counterfeiting the stamp used for the sale of perfumery and for hair powder

Robbing a rabbit warren

Personating a Greenwich pensioner

Harbouring an offender against the Revenue Acts


                                                        An Execution in Ratisbon in 1782


At the beginning of the nineteenth century there were more than 200 offences in the State book for which capital punishment might be inflicted. However, during the preceding three-quarters of a century only twenty-five offences actually condemned anyone to a sentence of death. In 1823 five statutes, exempting from the death penalty about a hundred felonies, were passed into law.

George Cruikshank states, ‘ About the year 1818, I was returning home between 8 and 9 a.m. down Ludgate Hill, and saw several human beings hanging opposite Newgate, and to my horror two of them were women. On inquiring, I was informed that it was for passing forged one pound notes! It had a great effect on me, and I was determined, if possible, to put a stop to this shocking destruction of life for merely obtaining a few shillings by fraud. I felt sure that in many cases the rascals who had forged the notes induced these poor, ignorant women to go into the gin shops and get ’some thing to drink’ and then pass the notes and hand them the change.’



Three Kids Gripped By Evil By Polly Mullaney     
Amazon Kindle, Amazon paperback




No comments:

Post a Comment